Legal Opinion

Lange v. Tumm

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 31, 2000No. 99-3247-FTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

¶ 1. Archie Lange 1 appeals a summary judgment declaring an old town highway discontinued. We reverse the judgment because there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the highway was entirely abandoned.

Background

¶ 2. Lange brought a declaratory judgment action against Ronald Tumm and the Town of Lud-ington seeking declaration that an old town highway leading to his property remains open as a public highway. Lange owns property adjacent to property owned by Tumm. The highway crosses Tumm's land into Lange's land, where it ends.

¶ 3. No public funds have been used to maintain the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ervin v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Smith v. Dodgeville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  3. Johnson v. City of EdgertonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Young v. MareschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Affiliated FM InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Povolny v. TotzkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  2. Markos v. SchallerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  3. Town of Schoepke v. RustickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API