Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Edgerton

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 5, 1996No. 96-0894PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEich, C.J.

George and Cecil Johnson appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their action against the City of Edgerton. They sued the City for injunctive relief and damages when they were unable to gain access to their property from the unimproved "stub-end" of a city street. The trial court dismissed the action, concluding that the City was immune from suit under the "governmental immunity" provisions of § 893.80(4), Stats., 1 for its refusal to open the street to the Johnsons' lot line.

The issues are: (1) whether the immunity granted by § 893.80(4), STATS., is limited to actions in tort, or whether…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Figgs v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of ShelbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Milwaukee District Council 48 v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Schmeling v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Philip Myers v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API