Town of Schoepke v. Rustick
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
¶ 1. Thomas and James Rustick appeal a judgment, after a nonjury trial, in favor of the Towns of Schoepke and Enterprise, concluding that Highway 26 is not entirely abandoned pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 82.19. The Rusticks argue the trial court applied an incorrect test of abandonment and placed an incorrect evidentiary burden on them. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
Background
¶ 2. The Rusticks own property along Highway 26, which is also known as Rustick Road. Highway 26 is a 1.75 mile low maintenance dirt road connecting State Highway 45 and Pratt Junction Road in Oneida County. Highway 26…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Madison v. GeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Strozinsky v. School District of Brown DeerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Jefferson v. EifflerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.