Commonwealth v. Bowes
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
The defendant was convicted on separate indictments charging, respectively, sodomy 1 and assault and battery with intent to ravish. He filed motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment, which were refused, and received identical concurrent sentences. These appeals followed.
Both offenses were committed upon a little girl aged six and one-half years, who was described by the trial judge as “very attractive” and “of unusual [mental] capacity for her age.” The perversion committed by the defendant was cunnilingus, 2 in which, of course, this little victim was the pathic.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KluskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth of Penna. v. DegrangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Commonwealth v. MoonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. GregorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- State v. MurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. WestcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Dunn v. TetiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- United States v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.