Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bowes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1950No. Appeals, 18 and 19PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

The defendant was convicted on separate indictments charging, respectively, sodomy 1 and assault and battery with intent to ravish. He filed motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment, which were refused, and received identical concurrent sentences. These appeals followed.

Both offenses were committed upon a little girl aged six and one-half years, who was described by the trial judge as “very attractive” and “of unusual [mental] capacity for her age.” The perversion committed by the defendant was cunnilingus, 2 in which, of course, this little victim was the pathic.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KluskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Commonwealth of Penna. v. DegrangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Commonwealth v. MoonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Commonwealth v. GregorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. State v. MurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. WestcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Dunn v. TetiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. United States v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API