Legal Opinion
People v. Bell
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1955No. Crim. 3048PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Defendant Margaret Bell was charged with pandering (1 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act No. 1906; Stats. 1911, p. 9, chap. 14, now Pen. Code, § 266i) in that from July, 1951, to January, 1952, she feloniously procured Clarice Strange to act as an inmate in a house of prostitution. She was found guilty by a jury. She appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying her motion for a new trial.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not challenged. The evidence, however, must be referred to in order to consider the points raised by appellant.
Clarice Strange…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- People v. SarazzawskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. CassandrasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- State v. Fong LoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. EdgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Fields v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. BuonoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. CooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.