Brumley v. Flint
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
In December, 1887, one Chester R. Brumley leased from the owner 16,320 acres of grazing land for the year 1888. Between January 1 and February 7, 1888, the defendant’s cattle wrongfully entered upon a portion of this land, and ate up, trod down, and destroyed the grass and feed growing thereon. In May, 1888, the said Brumley died, and thereafter the plaintiffs were duly appointed and qualified as executors of his will'. The plaintiffs, as such executors, brought this action to recover damages for the alleged trespasses of defendant’s cattle in the sum of one thousand dollars. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Nightingale v. ScannellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Martin v. TraversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Reed v. DraisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Pralus v. Jefferson Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by14 opinions
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Crocker v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Covina Union High School District v. JobeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.