Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1986No. C4-86-452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant insurance company challenges a trial court judgment confirming an arbitration award and a subsequent judgment awarding respondent insured attorney fees. Appellant claims (1) the arbitration award should have been reduced by setting off a basic economic loss-benefits payment, (2) it should have been permitted trial de novo pursuant to the terms of the involved policy, and (3) the trial court abused its discretion in awarding bad faith attorney fees. We affirm.

FACTS

On June 12, 1982, respondent Brian Pierce was a passenger in a car owned and driven by Kevin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pischke v. KellenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Strand v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Breslaw v. BreslawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Minnesota Licensed Practical Nurses Ass'n v. Bemidji Clinic, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Lysholm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API