Legal Opinion

Pischke v. Kellen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1986No. CX-85-2048PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from an order granting respondent summary judgment and denying appellant’s motion for amended complaint. Appellant claims the trial court (1) should have permitted an amended complaint to clarify appellant’s causes of action and (2) erred in granting summary judgment because claims against respondent have not been released as a matter of law. We affirm.

FACTS

On January 9, 1983, appellant deputy sheriff William Pischke of Pipestone County was proceeding in his squad car to an accident west of Pipestone on Highway 30. Volunteer firefighter Steven…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Wilson v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Warrick v. GironSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glass v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  2. Hoffmann v. WiltscheckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Eustis v. David Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In Re CzubaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Road Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API