Legal Opinion

Lysholm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1987No. C8-86-1801PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants, Duane and Nancy Lysholm, brought suit against respondent, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, for compensation they claimed they were entitled to under. their automobile insurance contract. The trial court found appellants were bound by an earlier arbitration award and granted summary judgment to respondent. Appellants argue on appeal that the trial court erred in determining they were not entitled to a jury trial and in denying their motion to strike portions of respondent’s answer. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant, Duane Lysholm, was involved in two automobile…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Twomey v. DurkeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Pautz v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Helmerichs v. Bank of Minneapolis & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Houlihan v. FimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. In Re Hospitality Employment Group, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API