Babcock v. Koepke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of appellant’s complaint below seeking a declaratory judgment against the appellee defendant below, individually and as Area Rent Director, Los Angeles Defense Area, that certain premises in that defense area owned by appellant are not subject to the rent control provisions of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, SO U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq.
The complaint sought a preliminary injunction to restrain appellant from issuing a threatened order to fix rents on premises at rentals in the amount aggregating $1,200 per month, a sum…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Koepke v. FontecchioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Fritz Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1950
- May v. MaurerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.