Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Krupa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 27, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 13, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed by a cleaning service and was assigned to clean the Amtrak section of the Pennsylvania Central Railroad Station in New York City. Claimant was discharged from his employment after he entered the booth of a female train announcer employed by Amtrak, telling her that she was going to "train” him and then began rubbing his hand on her leg.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of SchienbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of FerroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of MaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.