Legal Opinion

United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Joseph J. Santopietro Paul R. Vitarelli, Perry A. Pisciotti

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 22, 1999No. Docket 97-1373L, 97-1571CON, 97-2410CON and 97-2449CONPublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals and cross-appeal primarily concern the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 666 (1994 & Supp. II 1996) and the continued validity of this Court’s decision in United States v. Foley, 73 F.3d 484 (2d Cir.1996), in light of the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 118 S.Ct. 469, 139 L.Ed.2d 352 (1997). Section 666(a)(1)(B), (b), set out in full in the margin, 1 punishes receipt of corrupt payments by any person who “corruptly solicits or demands” money “intending to be influenced or rewarded in connection…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. California v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Sabri v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Salvador A. VivitCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Robert SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Albert Louis Lipscomb, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API