California v. Roy
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
A California court convicted respondent Kenneth Roy of the robbery and first-degree murder of Archie Mannix. The State’s theory, insofar as is relevant here, was that Roy, coming to the aid of a confederate who was trying to rob Mannix, helped the confederate kill Mannix. The trial judge gave the jury an instruction that permitted it to convict Roy of first-degree murder as long as it concluded that (among other things) Roy, “with knowledge of” the confederate’s “unlawful purpose” (robbery), had helped the confederate, i. e., had “aid[ed],” “promote[d],” “encourage[d],” or “instigate[d]” by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by346 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mitchell v. EsparzaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Anthony N. Matteo v. Superintendent, Sci Albion the District Attorney of the County of Chester the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.