Legal Opinion

California v. Roy

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 4, 1996No. 95-2025PublishedCited by 346 opinions

1Per curiam

A California court convicted respondent Kenneth Roy of the robbery and first-degree murder of Archie Mannix. The State’s theory, insofar as is relevant here, was that Roy, coming to the aid of a confederate who was trying to rob Mannix, helped the confederate kill Mannix. The trial judge gave the jury an instruction that permitted it to convict Roy of first-degree murder as long as it concluded that (among other things) Roy, “with knowledge of” the confederate’s “unlawful purpose” (robbery), had helped the confederate, i. e., had “aid[ed],” “promote[d],” “encourage[d],” or “instigate[d]” by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by346 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Mitchell v. EsparzaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Anthony N. Matteo v. Superintendent, Sci Albion the District Attorney of the County of Chester the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API