Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Anadarko Production Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1973No. 43297PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This is an action in equity by Mr. and Mrs. Dixon to cancel the deeper horizons of an oil and gas lease for an alleged failure of the lessee, Anadarko Production Company, to comply with the implied covenant to fully develop. Plaintiffs did not allege that a well if drilled to the deeper horizon would produce enough oil to repay the cost of drilling, equipping, and operating the well. Plaintiffs were proceeding upon the theory that “it is not necessary to allege or prove the ‘prudent operator’ rule or that a well drilled on the tract would produce in commercial quantities,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. BolesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. SledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Crocker v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Zinke & Trumbo, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. Pace v. HymasIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sloan v. JeffersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Mitchell v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API