Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 1, 1981No. 53204 to 53216PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
This appeal arises from the trial of 18 actions to cancel oil and gas leases in the District Court of Ellis County, Oklahoma, the Honorable Charles M. Wilson, presiding. This appeal refers to 13 of the 18 cases consolidated for trial to the extent that the evidence presented would apply to each separate case. The balance of five actions, being against Shell Oil Company, have not been appealed. A judgment in that company’s favor was rendered because there was no dispute Shell had complied with those duties urged to inure in an oil and gas lease in this action.
These lawsuits…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Indiana Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Voiles v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Alford v. Collins-McGregor Operating Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- COVEL v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- James Energy Co. v. HCG Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Del Webb Communities, Inc. v. PartingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.