Legal Opinion

Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Zinke & Trumbo, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1986No. Nos. 85-1698, 85-1803PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

This appeal and cross-appeal is from a judgment containing an interlocutory order, duly certified pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Our jurisdiction vests pursuant thereto and by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). There are many issues presented in this complex diversity based case. However, only one is dispositive. That involves a party’s failure to object to a jury’s general verdict on the ground of inconsistency prior to the discharge of the jury.

I

Factual Background

Appellees John Hamilton and Martha Francis own three-fourths of the mineral estate underlying a 640 acre…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chardon v. Fumero SotoSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Fernandez v. ChardonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  3. Itel Capital Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Company, Incorporated, a Corporation and Herman Mulvehill, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Tennessee Consolidated Coal Company and Grundy Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  5. Mrs. Harvey Stancill v. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc., and Carriers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Martin T. Kosmynka and Christine Kosmynka v. Polaris Industries, Inc., Docket No. 05-3958-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Clyde W. HINDS and Mary Lee Hinds, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Bartee v. Michelin North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Harris Market Research, & Counterclaim v. Marshall Marketing and Communications, Inc., & Third-Party v. Larry R. Harris, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API