Legal Opinion

Buxton v. Ainsworth

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1904No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to Ionia; Smith (Stearns F.), J., presiding. Case by James Buxton against Thomas Ainsworth for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment of $1,000 for damages incurred in a collision between vehicles severally driven by plaintiff and defendant. The collision took place on the 8th of November, 1901, at a point about two miles north of the village of Lake Odessa. The plaintiff and his wife were returning from Ionia to their home, at Lake Odessa, in a single covered buggy. The defendant was driving north from Lake Odessa toward his home in the country. He was driving a single buggy. The testimony was conflicting as to whether it was dark or otherwise at the time of the collision. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Quinn v. O'KeeffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Williams v. Village of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kelly v. Huber Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  4. Black v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Winckowski v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API