Legal Opinion
Williams v. Village of Petoskey
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Emmet; Adams, J. Case by Mae A. Williams against tbe village of Petoskey for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Action for negligent injury. The declaration avers:
“The said defendant, before and at the time óf the committing of the grievances and negligence hereinafter mentioned, controlled, used, and had jurisdiction of a certain wooden bridge located on Lake street, within the corporate limits of said village of Petoskey, the defendant herein. Said bridge was constructed over and across Bear river, so called, and the water race-way or flume used by said defendant for the purpose of conducting water from said Bear river into the waterworks of said village of Petoskey; said flume or race-way running…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Saulsbury v. . Village of IthacaNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Cousins v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Shippy v. Village of Au SableMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- O'Neil v. Village of West BranchMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Gallagher v. City of St. PaulU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buxton v. AinsworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Kethledge v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Welton v. Township of CrystalMichigan Supreme Court · 1908