Legal Opinion

Harley v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1984No. 82-818PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Associate Judge, Retired:

A jury convicted appellant of assault with intent to commit robbery while armed in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-501, -3202 (1981). On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by admitting hearsay testimony into evidence. We perceive no error by the court below and accordingly affirm appellant’s conviction.

On August 11, 1981, shortly before 10:00 p.m., the complainant, Paula Cornett, drove a friend to Union Station. After seeing her friend to the train, Cornett walked back to her car. As she approached the area where her car…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Warren v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Reed v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Tribble v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Morris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Morris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Battle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Porter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Paris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Dancy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API