Legal Opinion

Morris v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1978No. 12259PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge.

Convicted by a jury of armed robbery and possession of a prohibited weapon (sawed-off shotgun), appellant challenges the admission of testimony concerning the description of the robbers given by the complainant to police officers immediately after the robbery. Appellant also argues that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to permit cross-examination of appellant’s girlfriend as to his actual use of her father’s car on the day of the incident. We affirm. 1

In the early afternoon of August 4, 1976, Daryl Covington was robbed by two men, one of whom was armed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Malcus T. Clemons v. United States of America, David E. Clark v. United States of America, Alvin C. Hines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Beatty v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API