United States Gypsum Co. v. Carney
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
These are two actions of tort for alleged misrepresentation, arising out of the acceptance of an order of the Lowell Institution for Savings by the defendant Carney, without authority, and the assigning of the order by the defendant Stern to the plaintiff,
*582In each action the declaration mutatis mutandis set out in substance the same facts. The defendant in each action demurred to the declaration, assigning as cause in the action against David Stern, that “The declaration does not state a legal cause of action as the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant because it alleges that he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- David v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Jekshewitz v. GroswaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Kerr v. ShurtleffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Lynch v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Shawmut Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Schleifer v. Worcester North Savings InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Alfred J. Silberstein Inc. v. NashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Joseph A. Previte, Inc. v. BowerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
- Zoppo v. John Hancock InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996