Legal Opinion
Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 22, 1893PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.
This is an action for deceit which was one of thirteen cases tried together, founded on alleged false representations of the defendant contained in the following letter:
“ Minneapolis, Minn., Feb. 6, 1890. Mr. George W. Davis, Minneapolis, Minn. Dear Sir, — We have in our possession the original documents printed in the advertisement of your bonds secured by mortgage to this company as trustee upon the Hedderly tract in this city. We indorse the estimates of value contained therein, made by Messrs. Marsh and Bartlett, I. C. Seeley, Jones, McMullan, & Co., and E. A. Harmon, all of whom are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chatham Furnace Co. v. MoffattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Gordon v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Windram v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Holmes v. Turner's Falls Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- McNeil v. Boston Chamber of CommerceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- National Shawmut Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Ste. Marie v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- Bank of Atchison County v. ByersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Donnelly v. Baltimore Trust & Guarantee Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.