Legal Opinion
Alfred J. Silberstein Inc. v. Nash
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 16, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The defendant Nash as chairman, together with one Thompson, one Benkert and one Diefenbach, constituted a so called committee which in 1933 solicited the deposit with a named depositary of debenture bonds of Associated Gas & Electric Company, in order that united action might be taken by the committee on behalf of debenture holders against a plan for the rearrangement of the capital of that company advanced by it. Service was made on the defendant Nash only, and the plaintiff discontinued its action as against the other members of the committee, who were residents of New York.
The plaintiff is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Mackintosh v. ChambersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- MacDonald v. AdamianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Downey v. Union Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Hayes v. GessnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Robinson v. Trustees of the New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Coburn v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.