Legal Opinion
Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co. v. County of Maui
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1964No. 4323PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
MIZUHA, J.. On. September 6, 1938, plaintiff-appellee conveyed to defendant-appellant a fifty acre rectangular parcel of land for school purposes. The deed contained the following clause:
“If at any time within the period of twenty-one (21) years after the date hereof the Grantee shall cease to use the said premises or any part thereof for school purposes the Grantor, its successors or assigns, shall have and may exercise the first and exclusive right and option to repurchase from the Grantee or its successors the whole of said premises, should the Grantee cease to use…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trustees of Union College v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Dade County v. City of North Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- McDougall v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Alamo School District v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gange Et Ux. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Griffis v. Davidson County Metropolitan GovernmentTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- In re State to Register Title to Real Property Situate at MoililiHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- In re State to Register Title to Real Property Situate at MoililiHawaii Supreme Court · 1967