In re State to Register Title to Real Property Situate at Moilili
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OP RICHARDSON, C.J., WITH WHOM CIRCUIT JUDGE OKINO, IN PLACE OP LEWIS, J., DISQUALIFIED, JOINS
I respectfully dissent.
I
First, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the sole specification of error is not deficient — no “more than inconvenience” — and that said specification of error merits consideration on this appeal. The State correctly concludes that “there is presented to this court no error concerning any question of law nor any error concerning evidential matters and rulings by the lower court.” Appellant’s specification of error is patently defective under…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coosaw Mining Co. v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Slidell v. GrandjeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lindsey and Others v. the Lessee of MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Mitchell v. BranchHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.