Legal Opinion
United States v. Calvert
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2008No. 06-30643PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge LARSON; Concurrence by Judge B. FLETCHER.
*1239LARSON, District Judge:
Today we resolve a sentencing guideline question left open in our decision in United States v. Smith: When someone is convicted of retaliating against a federal witness in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b), may the eight-level increase found in United States Sentencing Guidelines (“USSG”) § 2J1.2(b)(l) (Nov. 2000) for an offense “causing or threatening to cause physical injury to a person ... in order to obstruct the administration of justice” be imposed even if no judicial proceeding was pending at the relevant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Albert Weston, United States of America v. Paul R. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Joshua R. KilbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. WardellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Agustin Valenzuela Gallardo v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. UlibarriDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- United States v. WardellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. AhmmedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.