Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Weston, United States of America v. Paul R. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 25, 1992No. 91-1546, 91-1547PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Following a joint trial, Paul R. Taylor and Albert Weston were convicted of threatening bodily injury with intent to retaliate for information given to law enforcement officials in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1513 (1988). Taylor was also convicted of carrying a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (1988). Taylor challenges certain rulings made at the trial. He and Weston both protest the district court’s sentencing determinations. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

We summarize the facts in the traditional post-conviction fashion,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Barry J. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. United States v. Anthony FioreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Michael Barnett, United States of America v. Barry Jordan, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API