United States v. Ahmmed
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
The facts of this case are known to the parties and need not be repeated here. Ferdous Ahmmed appeals his sentence, imposed following his conviction for three counts of witness retaliation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b)(1). He presents two arguments on appeal.
First, Ahmmed argues that the district court erred when it refused to group his three counts of conviction for sentencing purposes under U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2(b). The three separate acts of witness retaliation that Ahmmed committed, separated by a period of months, were sufficiently distinct that they “cannot be considered…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Ronald Stephen SneezerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008