Legal Opinion

United States v. Ahmmed

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 18, 2008No. 05-50965Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

The facts of this case are known to the parties and need not be repeated here. Ferdous Ahmmed appeals his sentence, imposed following his conviction for three counts of witness retaliation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b)(1). He presents two arguments on appeal.

First, Ahmmed argues that the district court erred when it refused to group his three counts of conviction for sentencing purposes under U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2(b). The three separate acts of witness retaliation that Ahmmed committed, separated by a period of months, were sufficiently distinct that they “cannot be considered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald Stephen SneezerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API