Hicks v. New York Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
Defendants’ only contention is that the evidence does not sustain the jury’s finding. The residence was equipped with an oil-burning hot-water heating system. At the time in question plaintiffs were in Florida. They had provided a friend, Flerbert Lange, with a key to the house. When he entered the house on February 26, 1950, he found that a radiator on the third floor was leaking and that the water had soaked the entire first and second floors. Plumbers were called and found a broken radiator on the third floor. They turned off the water in the basement, shut off the burner, disconnected the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McGaw v. WassmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Vogelsburg v. Mason & Hanger Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Walraven v. Sprague, Warner & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vonasek v. Hirsch and Stevens, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Hart-Bartlett-Sturtevant Grain Co. v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Peil v. KohnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. United Military Supply, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. United Military Supply, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975