Walraven v. Sprague, Warner & Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The defendants’ principal contention on this appeal is that the court erred in failing to grant their motion for a directed verdict on the ground that the evidence does not admit of a finding that the cans of crab meat and tuna fish in question contained any contaminated or poisonous substance when the cans were sold by defendants. There was evidence that two 6 or 7-ounce cans of tuna fish and a like-sized can of crab meat, which Sprague, Warner & Company had sold to the Jackson Grocery Company, were purchased from it by Mrs. Virgil Glaves on April 16, 1936. That evening she took these cans,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Bucher v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Matuschka v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Dreher v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McGaw v. WassmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- McAleavy v. LoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Vogelsburg v. Mason & Hanger Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Blarjeske v. Thompson's Restaurant Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Shaw v. Swift & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.