Legal Opinion

Walraven v. Sprague, Warner & Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The defendants’ principal contention on this appeal is that the court erred in failing to grant their motion for a directed verdict on the ground that the evidence does not admit of a finding that the cans of crab meat and tuna fish in question contained any contaminated or poisonous substance when the cans were sold by defendants. There was evidence that two 6 or 7-ounce cans of tuna fish and a like-sized can of crab meat, which Sprague, Warner & Company had sold to the Jackson Grocery Company, were purchased from it by Mrs. Virgil Glaves on April 16, 1936. That evening she took these cans,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bucher v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Matuschka v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Dreher v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McGaw v. WassmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. McAleavy v. LoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Vogelsburg v. Mason & Hanger Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Blarjeske v. Thompson's Restaurant Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Shaw v. Swift & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API