Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Clark

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1912No. 7,255PublishedCited by 63 opinions

Prom Clay Circuit Court; John M. Bawley, Judge. Action by William P. Clark, administrator of the estate of Maggie Clark, deceased, against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company, and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

— This action was brought by appellee to recover damages from appellants and the Guilfoil Contracting Company on account of the alleged negligent killing of appellee’s decedent, Maggie- Clark, on November 1, 1906. The complaint is in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer was overruled. Defendants filed separate answers in general denial, and the. issues thus formed were tried by a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of appellee and against appellants, and in favor of defendant Guilfoil Contracting Company. This appeal is taken from a judgment rendered on this verdict.

The complaint…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Seale. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. OtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Paris & G. N. Ry. Co. v. StaffordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API