Moultrie v. Wright
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County denying a new trial. Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The defendants interested are Wm. C. Hoffmann and Louise Wright. It is claimed that the ■court below erred in excluding important and material evidence for the defendants and for the cross-complainant, Hoffmann.
The complaint stated a cause of action against the defendants to quiet title to a tract of land. The defendants jointly answered, alleging that Hoffmann was the owner of an undivided one half of the land, that the defendant Louise Wright held under him as lessee thereof, and that the deceased, Handley B. Doane,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Murphy v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hidden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Faylor v. FaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Fulton v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Brown v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.