Legal Opinion

National Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. the Praetorians

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1934No. 2932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELPHREY, Chief Justice.

This suit was disposed of upon an agreed case, but we shall not here state the case as agreed. The following statement, we think, will suffice:

Defendant in error loaned B. E. Houghton in the neighborhood of $48,000, for which he executed notes payable to defendant in error and to secure which he executed a first lien on certain property.

Houghton, then in compliance with his contract with The Praetorians, insured the property with plaintiff in error, the interest of The Praetorians being insured to the extent of $30,000.

The policy contained the following clause; “On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camden Fire Insurance v. Harold E. Clayton & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. British American Assur. Co. of Toronto v. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
  2. Lervold v. Republic Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. MFA Mutual Insurance Company v. HuddlestonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Union Assurance Society, Ltd. v. Equitable Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API