British American Assur. Co. of Toronto v. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.
There is no controversy as to the facts in this ease, as the trial court’s findings are not' challenged by any of the parties hereto.
It is disclosed that defendant in error, A. A. Maupin, owned a five-acre tract of land near Harlingen, Tex., upon which was situated a residence. The defendant in error, Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company, held a valid and subsisting lien against said property to secure the payment of vendor’s lien notes, upon which Maupin was liable, in the principal sum of $4,500, the total amount due upon said indebtedness at the timé of the trial being $5,806.49.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- East Texas Fire Insurance v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Walker v. Queen Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- New Orleans Insurance v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Providence-Washington Ins. Co. v. LevyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Camden Fire Ins. v. SutherlandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lexington Insurance Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Kelley v. American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. CrutchfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. WestmorelandTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Lervold v. Republic Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.