Legal Opinion

Camden Fire Insurance v. Harold E. Clayton & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1928No. 15667PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This case is before us on application for writ of error. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is published in 298 S. W., 451.

Camden Fire Insurance Association issued a policy to M. H. Hines covering an automobile in the amount of $325. Hines owed $340.72 on the car, represented by twelve notes, each and all of which were "secured by a valid chattel mortgage on the car * * * which notes and mortgage were in favor of and payable to Harold E. Clayton & Company.” The policy sued on showed that the property was encumbered, and the amount of the encumbrance, represented by twelve notes. It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southland Life Ins. Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Home Ins. Co. v. BoatnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. First Texas Prudential Ins. v. SorleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Carbide International, Ltd. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Hatch v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Citizens State Bank of Dickinson, Tex. v. American Fire & Casualty CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Don Chapman Motor Sales, Inc. v. National Savings Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Grant v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1955

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API