Legal Opinion

Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlanc

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1966No. 6536PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILES, Judge.

The plaintiffs, Hilary J. Gaudin and the law partnership of Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller, prior to the filing of this action obtained a judgment against Dudley J. Le-Blanc for a legal fee owed to them. This judgment was in the amount of $17,250, and was obtained in the Fifteenth Judicial District Court of Vermilion Parish, and was made executory in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. Subsequently, by order of the latter named court, garnishment proceeding was issued. Citation in the garnishment proceeding was issued to the State of Louisiana through the Governor, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. State v. DarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Delacroix v. BarrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1872
  4. Fischer v. DubrocaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Marcuse v. UptonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  2. United States v. Allen Brothers of Homer, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1984
  3. First Quality Carpets, Inc. v. KirschbaumSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  4. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. PattenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API