St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BAILES, Judge.
This is a companion suit of Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller, et al. v. LeBlanc, No. 6536 on the docket of this court, reported in 182 So.2d 835. The issue of law in this case and the above cited companion case is identical. The reasons for judgment assigned in the companion case are controlling of the issue in this case.
Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Cost of these proceedings to be paid by defendant, judgment debtor, David I.Patten.
Reversed and remanded.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. PattenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966