Legal Opinion

St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Patten

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1966No. 6544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILES, Judge.

This is a companion suit of Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller, et al. v. LeBlanc, No. 6536 on the docket of this court, reported in 182 So.2d 835. The issue of law in this case and the above cited companion case is identical. The reasons for judgment assigned in the companion case are controlling of the issue in this case.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Cost of these proceedings to be paid by defendant, judgment debtor, David I.Patten.

Reversed and remanded.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. PattenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966