Legal Opinion
Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlanc
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 7, 1966No. 48132, 48133PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
On February 20, 1962, the New.'.Orleans law firm of Weinstein & Bronfin, together with Attorney Hilary Gaudin of that city,. filed suit in Vermilion Parish and obtained judgment against Dudley J. LeBlanc for unpaid attorney’s fees in the sum of $17,250, with interests and costs. Thereafter, because of the death of Weinstein, his interest in the judgment was assigned by his widow to the reconstituted firm of Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller. In the meantime LeBlanc had been elected State Senator.
On the petition of Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller and Gaudin, plaintiffs in this…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Buchanan v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Hall v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State v. DarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Cobb v. Louisiana Board of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barrios v. Haskell Cnty. Pub. Facilities Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Board of Comm'rs. of Port of New Orleans v. Splendour S. & E. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Thacker v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- BARRIOS v. HASKELL COUNTY PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY FOUTCH v. TURN KEY HEALTHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Alexander v. LancasterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.