State v. Dark
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Justice.
The indictment charging the defendants, W. D. Dark and L. J. Melton, under the provisions of Section 1 of Act 78 of 1890, with accepting a bribe was quashed by the trial judge upon defendants’ motion and demurrer and the state has appealed.
In the indictment the defendants are charged with “ * * * being * * * State Officers, and as such State Officers, did * * * feloniously receive from one George D. Pipes, a sum of money, to-wit: One Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($1,-000.00) lawful money of the United States of America, as a bribe, present or reward for the purpose of inducing…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Helvering v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. MauriceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1823
- State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- C. C. Clark and Others v. . E. R. Stanley and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. VinzantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Chappuis v. ReggieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- State v. VarnadoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Mullins v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- State v. PeteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.