Livesay v. Tennessee Board of Examiners in Watchmaking
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
delivered the opinion of the Court. •
The privilege of engaging in Tennessee in the occupation of repairing watches and clocks is limited by Chapter 101 of the Public Acts of 1955, Code, Section 62-1401 ei seq., to those who meet, and continue to comply with, the requirements of that statute, and the rules and regulations made pursuant thereto by its five-member board of examiners. The constitutionality of that statute is the question for decision.
This Board is given authority by that statute “to promulgate rules and regulations to carry out the intent of this chapter, and to establish…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Harbison v. Knoxville Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. GreesonTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
- Campbell v. McIntyxeTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Martin v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Ford Motor Company v. PaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. AAA Aaron's Action Agency Bail Bonds, Inc.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- McClellan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.