Legal Opinion
State v. Greeson
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1939PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
These cases involve the authority of the State Board of Barber Examiners (1) to fix prices of barber work in the several counties of the State, and (2) to fix the hours that barber shops may be operated.
In the Hamilton County case the defendants were severally presented for cutting hair at a price lower than that fixed by the Board. The trial court held the Act under' which the Board was proceeding invalid and quashed the presentments. The State appealed.
In the Davidson County cause the chancellor sustained the authority of the Board to fix the prices of barber work, but held its order…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Baugh v. NovakTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Bowden Building Corp. v. Tennessee Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.