Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1998No. 96-1554, 97-1093PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, Roadway Express, Inc. (“Roadway”) was found to have retaliated against an employee, Roy Roberts, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, after Roberts complained of racial harassment in the workplace. In, addition, the district court granted plaintiff costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. Appellant makes numerous allegations of error by the district court. These include a , refusal to grant judgment as a matter of law for insufficiency of the evidence; exclusion of relevant…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Anderson v. Coors Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- O'Neal v. Ferguson Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.