Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stoll v. Schneider

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

This is a replevin suit originating* in a justice of the peace court.

Sehneijder has for many years been engaged in the sale of barber and shoe shine parlor supplies in Memphis.

In the summer of 1926 Schneider entered into a written contract with Pappas, the pertinent provisions of which are as follows:

“Received this 16th day of June, 192.6, from E. P. Schneider, under conditional contract for the sale thereof, as hereinafter stated, the following described property:
“1 Two Section #604 Mirror Case 9 Ft.

Long ............................$104.00

“1 One Section #604 Mirror Case 6 ft.

long…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Kenner & Co. v. PetersTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Buice v. Scruggs Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  2. Nicley v. NicleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  3. Gould v. HuffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  4. Trentham v. HeadrickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  5. George J. Meyer Mfg. Co. v. SproulCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API