Legal Opinion

Gould v. Huff

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 4, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

Trover for the conversion of a Holstein cow. The plaintiff claims title and right of possession under a conditional sales agreement given by one Millard Palmer, from whom the defendant bought the cow. The presiding Judge excluded the instrument for (1) insufficiency of description and (2) lack of preliminary proof of actual knowledge on the part of the defendant of the existence of the conditional sale and the property it included. To these rulings and the direction of a verdict for the defendant exceptions were reserved.

The Bill of Exceptions discloses that March 21,1927, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. A. S. Thomas Furniture Co. v. T. & C. Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Nichols v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  3. Northwestern Bank v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Rogers v. WhitneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  5. First National Bank v. SpicerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mac Motor Sales, Inc. v. PateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  2. Beal v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  3. Tardiff v. M-A-C Plan of NESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  4. GLOBE SLICING MACHINE CO., INC. v. Casco Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  5. In Re Di PierroDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API