Legal Opinion

George J. Meyer Mfg. Co. v. Sproul

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 29, 1941No. 7311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

Appellant here is contending for a liberal construction of one of the Pennsylvania Recording Acts. The argument is, we think, inappropriate. That type of statute is for protection, not for punishment. Its interpretation should be strong to help its beneficiaries and not, as in the criminal law, tempered with mercy toward those it strikes down. This is particularly so in a State whose “abhorrence of the secret lien” did not even admit of the palliative of recording.1

The particular Recording Act is that applicable to the conditional sale of chattels attached to the realty.2…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Central Lithograph Co. v. Eatmor Chocolate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. A. S. Thomas Furniture Co. v. T. & C. Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Potter Mfg. Co. v. ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  5. Delco Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Empire State Chair Co., Inc. v. BeldockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. In re SettemDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  3. Miami Air Conditioning Co. v. RoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API