Legal Opinion
Tug New York Co. v. The Robin Doncaster
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 25, 1955No. Nos. 37, 45PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge.
These consolidated suits bring before us a number of claims which arose out of a collision in the Delaware River on the night of January 9, 1952, involving the steamship Robin Doncaster and the barge Agram while she was being towed by the tug Ruth.
The first suit was brought by the owner of the barge Agram against the S. S. Robin Doncaster and her owner for collision damages.' The second suit was instituted by the owner of the tug Ruth for exoneration from, and limitation of, liability. Damage claims were also filed in this proceeding by Seas Shipping Company, Inc., as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Construction Aggregates Co. v. Long Island R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- The La BretagneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- The BellhavenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- The MargaretCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Pacific Far East Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Barge Lake Farge Corp. v. S.S. SaxonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Maritrans Operating Partners L.P. v. M/T Faith IDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992