Legal Opinion

The Margaret

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 13, 1929No. 3723, 3724PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

30 F.2d 923 (1928)

THE MARGARET.

THE MANCHESTER MERCHANT.

THE HARRY M. WALL.

HUDSON et al.

v.

INDEPENDENT PIER CO. et al.

Nos. 3723, 3724.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

December 1, 1928.

On Rehearing February 13, 1929.

Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City, and Rawle & Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa. (John W. Crandall, of New York City, Joseph W. Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa., and H. Victor Crawford, of New York City, of counsel), for A. H. Bull S. S. Co.

Biddle, Paul, Dawson & Yocum, of Philadelphia, Pa. (H. Alan Dawson, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for cross-appellees Hudson and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. The "Atlas."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. The" North Star"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. The Schooner Catharine v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. The Eugene F. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Intagliata v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. N. M. Paterson & Sons, Ltd. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  4. Tank Barge Hygrade, Inc. v. The Tug Gatco New Jersey. Gulf Atlantic Transportation Company v. The Diesel Tanker F. L. Hayes. Appeal of Tank Barge Hygrade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  5. P. Dougherty Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API