Legal Opinion
In re the Fee Agreement of Smith
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided April 8, 1993No. Nos. 91-1058, 93-44 and 92-1385PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARLEY, Associate Judge:
On February 3, 1993, William G. Smith, Esq., pursuant to Rule 2 of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, moved for an Order consolidating the above-referenced matters in the interest of judicial economy. The motion was supported by attorneys Cox and Wick, as well as the Department of Veterans Affairs (formerly Veterans’ Administration) (VA) General Counsel. Although the form of the submissions filed and the relief sought differ slightly, in each matter the Court is asked to order the enforcement of a fee agreement by directing the Secretary of Veterans Affairs…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Russell v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Hugh D. Cox v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In the Matter of the Fee Agreement of Bruce Tyler Wick. Bruce Tyler Wick, Movant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- In re the Fee Agreement of CoxUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Zevalkink v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Hazan v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.