Legal Opinion
In re the Fee Agreement of Cox
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 7, 1997No. 95-1068PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
This case is before the Court, in the main, on an October 27, 1995, petition by an attorney seeking extraordinary relief in the form of an order that the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) issue a final decision on his claim to entitlement — under 38 U.S.C. § 5904(d) and pursuant to a valid fee agreement — to payment of 20% of past-due benefits that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded to his client and that he asserts that the Secretary wrongfully failed to withhold. Alternatively, he seeks an order from the Court that the BVA pay him those fees. Both…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Hugh D. Cox v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Rita L. Dicarlo v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Robert J. Ingram v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Buckley v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- John R. Ramsey Et Al. v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.