Legal Opinion

Black v. Circuit Court of Eighth Judicial Circuit

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1960No. 9843-46PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBiegelmeier, J.

The question presented for determination is whether SDC 37.48 requires a summons to be issued and served for the court to acquire jurisdiction -to enjoin the nuisance described therein or if jurisdiction is obtained by the procedure followed by the plaintiff in the trial court. By SDC 37.4801 places maintained for the purposes of lewdness or prostitution are declared to be nuisances and shall be enjoined and abated as provided in that chapter.

SDC 37.4802 provides:

“Whenever a nuisance is kept, maintained, or exists, as defined -herein, the state’s attorney or any citizen of the c'ounty m-ay…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilcox v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Matter of Julius Restaurant v. LombardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. People Ex Rel. Lemon v. ElmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Allman v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  5. Smith v. Housing Auth. of the City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. United Food Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Kinzler v. NaceySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Deno v. OvesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Revier v. School Board of Sioux Falls School District 49-5South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. North Central Investment Co. v. Vander VorsteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API